Dave (courier_iii) wrote,

Regarding Yesterday's Post......,

The first one is the favorite, by a margin of six to three.
The first had slightly more exposure that the second - by 1/2 f stop if you are camera oriented.

There was another technical difference however. As you open a lens you allow in more light, but you also decrease the depth of field - the area that is in sharp focus. When shooting as close as these, that can be as shallow a range as only an inch. [That's the technique used to make the background soft and fuzzy.] The first was shot at f5.6 for 1/100 second. The second had the lens partially closed - it was at f9 for 1/50 second. Because the lens was partially closed, the depth of field went to about six inches. That's why the veining was sharper.

Both are valid techniques. Ultimately the preference comes down to personal taste. The color is closer to the original in number 1 but I personally happen to like the slightly added sharpness of 2.

Thank You all for your opinions.
No new images tonight. I'm tired, and by the time you read this I'll be in bed.

  • Note to self...

    When turning on the air conditioner for the first time this season, do remember to also set the furnace thermostat for a [substantially] lower…

  • A Domestic Question...,

    But to begin with — some background. We live in a rural community. Seventy percent of the town is wooded parkland, we have working farms, hawks…

  • I should have taken a picture...,

    But I didn't. What's more important though is the simple fact. My weeping cherry has it's first, exactly one, open blossom, but, with many more to…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded